Welcome to Changeboard, the HR jobs & career development site Sign in | Join
Control Panel
image of HRCircles Banner
Hot Seat  My Career  Salary Surveys  Jobs  Forums  Events  C S R  About us  
Back
Fired up | The Apprentice | Week two

The number of ‘bright young’ candidates in series four of the Apprentice were reduced when the second hopeful was fired on Wednesday night.

Expert employment lawyers, from law firm Halliwells, will be keeping a watchful eye on the antics of Sir Alan and his apprentices in a weekly column, published every Thursday.

Christopher Davies, professional support lawyer, Halliwells

Shazia Wahab, who immediately claimed that she was being made a scapegoat, was obviously upset at her early exit. What may be surprising is that at the age of 35 she is one of the oldest candidates in this years bunch of what of have been described by the show’s host as ‘bright young things’.

Age discrimination was made unlawful in October 2006 when the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 came into force. The regulations provide protection to all employees and job applicants against less favourable treatment based on their age. The employer when faced with such a claim could either deny it or attempt to show that the treatment was justified.

In the US there is the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. This provides protection against less favourable treatment for older workers only. In the USA a rejected applicant for the US version of the same show brought proceedings against property tycoon Donald Trump over alleged age discrimination. Richard Hewett had failed to get on the show in 2005 and claimed that Trump and the show’s producers violated the USA age discrimination laws. Hewett claimed that his application was rejected because at the age of 49 he was considered too old.

Subsequently it has been reported that the legal proceedings Hewett brought have been the subject of a settlement the terms of which could not be disclosed. However it is interesting that his claim was based on the statistics that in six seasons, including the latest one called "Apprentice LA", 106 people out of hundreds of thousands of applicants were selected as finalists for these jobs and not one was over 42 years old. Here it has been reported for this season that there were a record 20,000 applications to take part on this series and yet none of those accepted are above the age of 40.

Could an age discrimination claim be brought here?

Click here if you missed Fired up | The Apprentice | Week one

Published Thursday, 03 April 2008 by Editor



Comments

 

HR Articles said:

As task manager Ian is fired after failing to get his team behind him, our legal eagle from Halliwells

April 11, 2008 9:55 AM
 

Editor's Blog said:

As task manager Ian is fired after failing to get his team behind him, our legal eagle from Halliwells

April 11, 2008 10:01 AM
To Have Your Say
 

Once you are an HR Circles member you'll be able to interact with the site - join discussion forums, add comments, contribute content, and subscribe to our email updates, digests and newsletters.

Back

Get in touch

We're always looking for experts to get involved and contribute editorial, news, podcasts and video content as well as upcoming events.

Natalie Cooper
Community website editor, Changeboard
T: +44 (0)20 8150 0240
E: natalie@changeboard.com

Bookmarks for This Blog

Subscribe to This Blog

  • RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • Receive Email Updates
    Subscribe
  • Archives of This Blog

     
    © Changeboard 2008 gws