Welcome to Changeboard, the HR jobs & career development site Sign in | Join
Control Panel
image of HRCircles Banner
Hot Seat  My Career  Salary Surveys  Jobs  Forums  Events  C S R  About us  
Back
Holiday rights | long-term sick leave?

Recently, the advocate-general (a legal officer who offers advice to the Judges in the European Court of Justice) gave his long awaited opinion on the case of Inland Revenue v Ainsworth and others. This could mean that employers have to give holiday rights to staff on long-term sick leave.

Michael Ball, employment partner, law firm Halliwells

Background to the case
 

• In the case of Inland Revenue v Ainsworth and others, a group of four employees claimed that they had the right to paid holidays while on sick leave under the Working Time Regulations 1998. One of the employees, Mrs Khan was on indefinite sick leave and asked for 20 days paid holiday during this time. The other three employees, Mr Ainsworth, Mrs Kilic and Mr Thwaites were dismissed while on long-term sick leave and asked for compensation in place of holiday which they hadn’t taken. 

• Back in 2005 this case made headlines when the Court of Appeal controversially held that the right to accrue paid holidays under the Working Time Regulations 1998 was at least in part conditional upon a worker being ‘in work’ and not absent due to sickness.

• The Court of Appeal held that Khan could not take statutory annual leave during a period in which she was on sick leave. The Court stated in the cases of Ainsworth, Kilic and Thwaites employees who had been absent due to sickness for the whole of the current leave year were not entitled to compensation on termination of employment. In reaching this conclusion the Court made it clear that the principle of ‘leave entitlement’ had to mean that there was something to have leave from.

• At the appeal, the House of Lords decided that the case raised the issue of how to interpret the European Working Time Directive.

• It was decided to refer these issues to the European Court of Justice (ECJ), under the changed case reference of Stringer v HMRC.

The advocate-general’s opinion

• The advocate-general stated that the right to paid annual leave does not depend on a worker's fitness for work. Therefore an employee on sick leave continues to accrue a right to annual leave under the Working Time Directive. Employees are entitled to take the leave when they return to work but may not take the leave during a period in which they are on sick leave.

• In relation to a payment on termination, the advocate-general said that an employee is entitled to a compensatory payment as a replacement for leave that has been acquired but not taken due to illness.

Implications

• It's likely that this opinion will be confirmed in the ECJ’s final decision, which is expected later this year (2008). The case will then return to the House of Lords for judgement.

• If the ECJ decides that employees are entitled to accrue paid holiday while on sick leave there is a risk that employers may terminate contracts of employees who are absent due to illness earlier than they would have done normally.

 

Published Wednesday, 27 February 2008 by Editor



Comments

 

HR Articles said:

The government has unveiled plans to combat long-term sickness absence , and would like to see employers

March 20, 2008 11:58 AM
To Have Your Say
 

Once you are an HR Circles member you'll be able to interact with the site - join discussion forums, add comments, contribute content, and subscribe to our email updates, digests and newsletters.

Back

Get in touch

We're always looking for experts to get involved and contribute editorial, news, podcasts and video content as well as upcoming events.

Natalie Cooper
Community website editor, Changeboard
T: +44 (0)20 8150 0240
E: natalie@changeboard.com

Bookmarks for This Blog

Subscribe to This Blog

  • RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • Receive Email Updates
    Subscribe
  • Archives of This Blog

     
    © Changeboard 2008 gws